AI-powered screen recording tools with automated features and smart capabilities

AI Features

Tools with AI-generated voiceover capabilities

AI Voiceovers

Tools with advanced audio recording and editing capabilities

Audio Recording

Tools that can automatically generate articles from recordings

Auto Article Generation

Screen recording tools with automatic caption generation for accessibility

Auto Caption

Enterprise-grade screen recording tools with security features

Enterprise Security

Completely free screen recording tools with no cost or limitations

Free

Screen recording tools with both free and paid tiers

Freemium

Premium screen recording tools with advanced features and professional support

Paid

Tools that can automatically generate scripts and content

Script Generation

Screen recording tools with built-in team collaboration features

Team Collaboration

Zoom Effects

Screen recording tools that work on Linux

Linux

Screen recording tools that work on macOS

macOS

Screen recording tools that work on Windows

Windows


## What you get

Loom is the shortest path from "I need to explain this" to "here's a video, watch it when you can." Atlassian acquired it in 2023 for $975M, and as of 2026 the product sits inside the Atlassian Administration console for billing and Guard for SSO/SCIM. The recording experience hasn't changed.

- One click recording from desktop app or Chrome extension
- A share link the second the recording ends, no upload spinner
- Cloud hosting with privacy controls and password protection on paid tiers
- Auto captions and transcripts in 50+ languages
- Recording quality up to 4K on Business and above
- Native Jira and Confluence recording entry points (post-Atlassian)
- A surprisingly deep set of integrations beyond Atlassian (Slack, Notion, Linear, GitHub)

## Who it's for

Loom is the default for async team communication.

1. Engineers explaining bugs without scheduling a call
2. PMs sharing scope clarifications across timezones
3. Sales sending personalized follow ups
4. Customer success walking a customer through a problem instead of typing 6 paragraphs
5. Support reps converting "how do I" tickets into short reusable answers

It is not designed for training modules. If you want a polished onboarding video with chapters, callouts, and quiz checkpoints, use Camtasia or ScreenPal.

## The AI features

The AI tier is where Loom earns its 2026 price. Skip it if all you need is the recorder.

### Auto titles, summaries, and chapters

The AI watches the recording and generates a title, a short summary, and chapter markers. The summaries are clean enough to drop into a Jira ticket or Slack post without editing. Chapters save real time on anything past 4 minutes.

### Filler word and silence removal

One click cuts "um" and dead air. The output sounds tighter, not robotic. Useful for sales videos where pacing matters.

### Edit by transcript

Delete a sentence in the text, the video cuts. Same model Descript pioneered. Loom's version is simpler and faster, but doesn't go as deep.

### Auto meeting recaps and notes

Newer in 2026. Loom records the meeting, generates a recap with timestamps, and lifts action items. Designed to compete with Otter.ai and the new Atlassian Rovo agents.

### Variables and auto CTAs

For sales workflows: dynamic variables (first name, company, custom fields) and auto-inserted CTAs at video end. Less useful for internal comms, very useful for outbound.

If you're not paying for AI, Loom is still the fastest recorder out there. You'll just do the title and summary yourself.

## Collaboration

This is where Loom earns its price.

- Share by link, paste anywhere
- Workspace libraries for shared team videos
- Granular access (team, individual, domain)
- Comments and reactions on the video itself
- Variable playback speed and picture in picture for the viewer
- Engagement analytics that show who watched, how far they got, and what they reacted to

For onboarding videos this is the difference between "we sent a video" and "we know who actually watched it."

## Security

Loom's security page redirects to Atlassian's security measures. Treat these as Atlassian-wide controls and compliance references, then confirm Loom-specific scope in the Atlassian Trust Center during procurement.

- SOC 2 and ISO 27001 referenced as part of Atlassian's ongoing compliance verification
- NIST 800-53 controls referenced in Atlassian's security measures
- Atlassian publishes FedRAMP-compliant solutions; confirm whether Loom is in scope for your required environment
- AES-256 encryption at rest, full disk
- TLS 1.2+ with Perfect Forward Secrecy in transit
- Zero Trust framework across Atlassian infrastructure
- GDPR via Atlassian's global privacy compliance program
- MFA on sensitive system access
- SSO and SCIM via Atlassian Guard (Enterprise tier)
- Centralized audit logging with read-only access

If your videos include staging environments or live customer UI, get the SOC 2 report, DPA, and product-specific compliance scope before broad rollout. The Atlassian controls are real but the procurement process is on you.

## What users actually say

Public sentiment in 2026 splits cleanly into "the product still works great" and "the Atlassian transition made admin and billing harder." Both are valid.

Common 2025-2026 complaints (synthesized from Trustpilot and competitor analyses):

> "I used to sign in with my Google account and it worked perfectly. Now I can't log in anymore."
> Trustpilot reviewer, post-Atlassian migration

> Some competitor analyses still frame the Atlassian migration as a major billing risk. Treat those examples as cautionary, not current plan documentation: Loom's current pricing FAQ still references Creator Lite members on Starter and Business.

Common praise:

> "I can explain any topic or demo, no meeting needed, within minutes. Loom's AI features are great."
> Rushan M., Freelance web designer

> "For team collaboration, Loom became a daily tool. Record, explain, share, no more long meetings."
> Manan B., AI Developer

### What people like

- Easiest tool in the category, full stop
- Plays nice with the rest of the SaaS stack
- Replaces meetings with 3-minute videos
- The free tier is enough to evaluate seriously
- AI summaries and chapters on Business + AI save real time
- New auto meeting recaps and notes (2026) extend the use case beyond async sends

### What people don't like

- The 5-minute cap on the free plan
- Editing is intentionally minimal, no timeline or motion graphics
- Workspace billing and role management can be confusing after the Atlassian migration
- Admins need to separate Creators from Creator Lite members before modeling cost
- Login and authentication issues reported through the 2025 Atlassian migration
- Legacy Enterprise migration to the new Atlassian Loom workspaces was still incomplete as of mid-2026

## How we'd use it

### Keep it short

If your Loom is longer than 5 minutes, you probably wrote a doc instead. Trim or split.

### Don't over script

Bullets, not a script. Loom shines when it sounds conversational. If you sound like you're reading, just record it again.

### Show real environments

Record on production or staging. Webcam overlay if it's a person-to-person message. Skip the webcam for tutorial style.

### Use chapters on longer recordings

If you go past 5 minutes, add chapters. Viewers come back for one section.

### Post in the workspace, not just DMs

Don't just direct-message. Post in the team workspace and link from the relevant doc. Future you will thank present you.

### Archive old videos

The library gets stale fast. Archive outdated content or future viewers will follow the wrong walkthrough.

### Use the AI tier intentionally

Business + AI is $20/user/month annual. It's only worth it if your team is making 10+ recordings per week, or if you use the new auto meeting recaps as a Notion replacement.

## Pricing

- **Starter** (Free): 25 videos, 5 minutes each, 720p, transcriptions in 50+ languages, 50 member cap
- **Business**: $18/user/month monthly, $15/user/month annual. Unlimited videos, up to 4K, password protection, analytics, exportable engagement
- **Business + AI**: $24/user/month monthly, $20/user/month annual. All Business features plus the full AI suite (summaries, chapters, filler removal, edit by transcript, auto meeting recaps)
- **Enterprise**: custom. Adds SSO via Atlassian Guard, SCIM, Salesforce integration, 99.95% uptime SLA, EBA compliance, custom data retention, dedicated account manager

Three things to know before buying in 2026:

1. Annual is ~17% cheaper than monthly; confirm Creator and Creator Lite role counts in the admin flow before buying
2. Atlassian.com vs. Loom.com purchasing: only Atlassian.com purchases get the Atlassian Administration hub, Jira/Confluence recording entry points, and Atlassian Guard SSO/SCIM
3. Creator Lite still appears in Loom's current pricing FAQ, so model Creator and Creator Lite roles directly in the admin flow before rollout

Most teams start free, hit the 5-minute cap or the analytics ceiling, then jump to Business. The AI tier earns its price if you're making 10+ recordings a week.

## Loom vs the alternatives

Pick Loom when:

- Speed and simplicity matter more than polish
- You already pay for Atlassian (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket) and want one bill
- You need cross platform support including Linux
- Non-technical contributors are part of your team

Pick something else when:

- You need a real timeline editor (Camtasia)
- You're automating doc generation from screen recordings (Clueso)
- You're on macOS and want a polished marketing demo (Screen Studio)
- You want step by step generated guides (Guidde)
- You record in clips and want to reorder before publishing (Tella)
- You need engagement data tied to CRM (Vidyard)

## Integrations

Loom plays well with everything you already use, and now plays especially well with Atlassian.

### Atlassian native

- Jira (record from a ticket, embed in issue)
- Confluence (record from a page, embed in doc)
- Atlassian Guard for SSO and SCIM
- Atlassian Administration for billing and admin

### Dev tools

- GitHub and GitLab (embed in PR comments)
- Linear (link recordings to issues)
- Slack and Discord (instant video updates)
- Notion (embed in pages)

### Productivity and CRM

- Google Workspace (Gmail, Drive, Calendar)
- Microsoft 365 (Teams, Outlook, SharePoint)
- Salesforce (Enterprise tier only)
- Zoom and Meet (record and share follow ups)

## Use cases we've seen work

### Bug repro for engineering

Record the issue path with webcam off. Drop the link in Jira. Engineering gets reproducible, timestamped context. With the AI tier, auto chapters mark where the bug appears.

### Async PM updates

A 3-minute Loom on Monday replaces the weekly status meeting. Auto summaries land in the team Notion page. People watch on their schedule.

### Sales follow ups

Personalized recap of a customer call with variables and an auto CTA. Open rates beat email-only by 2-3x in most teams' tests.

### Customer success check-ins

CSMs send a Loom on a renewal cycle instead of scheduling a 30-minute call. Engagement analytics tell them whether the customer watched.

### Support deflection

Top 10 "how do I" tickets get a 90-second Loom answer with a permanent link. Support team stops typing the same response.

### Meeting recaps (new in 2026)

Loom records the meeting, generates a recap with timestamps and action items. Replaces Otter/Fireflies for teams already on Atlassian.

## ROI

Returns come from replaced meetings, faster comprehension, and reduced support load.

What pays off:

- Hours saved by replacing 30-minute calls with 3-minute recordings
- Faster ramp for distributed teams across timezones
- Lower support volume on documented workflows
- Better engagement data on internal comms
- One bill if you're already on Atlassian

KPIs to track:

- Meeting hours replaced per week
- Watch completion rate on internal videos
- Support ticket deflection on documented workflows
- Average time from "explain this" to "explained" (before vs after)

What can hurt you:

- Mis-modeling Creator vs Creator Lite roles
- Overpaying for Business + AI seats nobody uses
- Atlassian/Loom admin differences if purchasing through different paths

## Is it right for you?

In 2026, Loom fits if you:

- Already pay for Atlassian and want consolidated billing
- Need async comms across distributed teams
- Don't need cinematic editing
- Have non-technical contributors who need a one-click tool

Wrong fit if you:

- Don't use Atlassian and the new pricing feels punitive
- Need a real editor (Camtasia, Descript)
- Want auto generated docs alongside the video (Clueso, Guidde)
- Need engagement data tied to a CRM (Vidyard)
- Need a very predictable role/billing model before procurement

## The honest take

Loom is still the best async video tool for software teams in 2026. The post-Atlassian transition created real admin and billing friction for some customers, especially teams with mixed creator and viewer populations. But the core recording experience is unchanged: hit record, get a link, share. If you're on Atlassian already, the integration story is now a real reason to standardize. If you're not, the price jump and role model are worth modeling carefully before signup.

Don't pay for the AI tier unless your team will actually use the summaries, chapters, and edit-by-transcript every week. The Business tier is still the right starting point for most teams.

## Sources reviewed

- https://www.loom.com/pricing (verified June 2026)
- https://www.loom.com/security (redirects to Atlassian security measures)
- https://www.atlassian.com/legal/security-measures
- https://supademo.com/blog/loom-pricing (2026 competitor analysis)
- https://www.g2.com/products/atlassian-loom/pricing
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/loom.com (partially blocked in our research run)
- https://www.g2.com/products/atlassian-loom/reviews (blocked in our research run, sentiment synthesized from Supademo analysis)

## Use with Knolbase

Record async walkthroughs and explainers in Loom. Upload them into Knolbase and we'll route them into the right learning paths based on user role and product stage. You record, we personalize.


The async video tool that replaced 'can we hop on a quick call' for an entire generation of SaaS teams

Loom is the reason your last 'this could've been a meeting' meeting didn't happen. Hit record, talk over your screen for 3 minutes, copy the share link, paste in Slack. That's the whole loop. Now part of Atlassian, with native Jira and Confluence recording entry points and shared SSO/SCIM through Atlassian Guard.

Loom

Loom is a screen and webcam recorder with one-click link sharing, now part of Atlassian with native Jira and Confluence integration; AI tier adds summaries, chapters, filler word removal, edit by transcript, and auto meeting recaps. Free plan caps videos at 5 minutes, Business at $18/user/month, Business + AI at $24/user/month; runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, and Chrome.


## What you get

Vidyard is a business video platform, not a consumer recorder. The 2026 release made it the most AI-forward business video tool in the category.

- Screen and webcam recording for demos, walkthroughs, async updates
- Hosting and share links so distribution doesn't need separate infrastructure
- Engagement tracking (view info and watch behavior, plan dependent)
- Branded sharing pages with customizable CTAs
- Folder management and team libraries
- Embedded sharing for email, websites, and sales touch points
- Video Agent (2026): auto generates personalized videos from buyer signals
- AI Avatars: talking-head videos without re-recording
- AI script generation for blank-page outreach
- Captions and transcripts on Teams+
- Native CRM and MAP integrations on Teams (Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach)
- SSO, IP access control, and secure playback on Enterprise

For training, this means fast, repeatable communication that you can measure. Not cinematic editing.

## Who it's for

Vidyard fits revenue and customer-facing teams where video is part of an operational motion.

1. Sales reps sending personalized prospect outreach
2. SDR teams automating Video Agent on inbound signals
3. CS teams running renewal and adoption check-ins
4. Onboarding teams measuring video engagement against activation
5. Support deflecting tickets with reusable video answers
6. Training functions tied to customer lifecycle metrics

It is not the right tool for:

- Quick async messages between teammates (use Loom, cheaper)
- Cinematic editing (use Camtasia or DaVinci)
- One-off recordings without a CRM integration story (overkill)

## The AI features

The 2026 release made AI the headline. Two flagship features matter.

### Video Agent

Auto generates personalized videos in response to buyer actions across CRM, sales engagement, or marketing automation tools. Inbound lead opens a pricing page, Vidyard generates a video with the prospect's name and use case, then sends via your connected workflow. Current public pricing describes Video Agent as an add-on for Starter and Teams, with Enterprise on custom pricing.

### AI Avatars

Talking-head videos without recording. Record once, reuse for personalized variants at scale. The Free plan includes 3 custom AI avatars. Paid plans expand the limits.

### AI script generation

Drafts video scripts from a brief with customizable tone. Useful for repeatable outreach where you're sending the same shape of video 100 times with personalization.

### Captions and transcripts

Auto-generated, available on paid plans. Standard table stakes at this point.

### What it doesn't have

No AI voiceovers for non-avatar narration. No AI translation or dubbing. No transcript-based editing. If those matter, look at Descript, Clueso, or Camtasia 2026.

## Collaboration

For team collaboration, Vidyard's value is operational.

- Record and share quickly, no long publish cycles
- Folder management and team libraries
- Reuse videos across onboarding, support, and sales moments
- Standardize outreach and training motions with shared templates
- Engagement visibility informs who needs follow up
- Team performance analytics on Teams+ tier

Practical model:

- Product or enablement creates baseline content
- GTM and support reuse and personalize where needed
- Managers use engagement to refine the library

Result: less duplicated explanation and faster knowledge transfer across customer-facing roles.

## Security

Vidyard's security posture is solid for an enterprise sales tool.

- SOC Type II compliant
- NIST and ISO 27001 frameworks referenced
- AWS infrastructure
- World-class encryption in transit and at rest, frequent encrypted backups
- RBAC and least privilege IAM
- Quarterly penetration tests
- Vulnerability remediation prioritization
- OWASP training for developers
- State-of-the-art monitoring and alerting
- Quarterly business impact and risk auditing
- Annual disaster recovery and business contingency testing
- IP access control and domain restrictions (Enterprise)
- SSO and secure playback (Enterprise)
- Audit logs and account history (Enterprise)

The vidyard.com/security page is intentionally high-level. For specifics on GDPR/CCPA, SSO/SAML/SCIM, MFA, and data retention, contact security@vidyard.com or visit trust.vidyard.com.

For software teams handling customer-adjacent workflows, governance is non-negotiable. Vidyard is built to serve orgs that need structured governance. Validate scope and current certifications during procurement.

## What users actually say

Verifiable signals from sources accessible in our research run:

> "Video saves my team time. It also makes us look professional, tech-savvy and cool, everything we want to project as a brand."
> Eric Simmons, VP of Sales, MediaValet (Vidyard case study)

> "With no embedded call to action on our YouTube video content and no way to capture those leads, we were letting prospects slip through our fingers."
> Ashish Agarwal, Head of Digital Marketing and Strategy, Zycus (Vidyard case study)

> "Awful system and so over complicated to delete your account..."
> Trustpilot reviewer headline, Aug 12, 2024

The pattern: strong praise from successful deployments with CRM tie-in. Critical feedback from some users around account and support experience. Typical for B2B tools at this scale.

### What people like

- Faster async than scheduling meetings
- Strong workflow fit for sales, CS, and onboarding
- Helpful visibility into who watched and how much
- Easy link-based sharing for distributed teams
- The 2026 Video Agent automates outreach at scale
- Native CRM/MAP integrations on Teams (HubSpot, Salesforce, Outreach)

### What people don't like

- Team pricing is quote-based once you need CRM/MAP integrations
- Video Agent is an add-on below Enterprise
- Some account management friction
- Not a full editing suite

## How we'd use it

### Tie every recording to a CRM moment

The whole point of Vidyard over Loom is that engagement data flows into the CRM. Make sure the recordings are tagged to a contact and a stage. Otherwise you're paying Vidyard prices for Loom value.

### Define the objective before recording

Each video should map to one concrete buyer or learner outcome ("Configure SSO for first-time setup", "Create your first dashboard"). Don't combine outcomes in one recording.

### Build a reusable pattern

Same shape every time:

- Context (why this matters)
- Walkthrough
- Common pitfalls
- Success criteria
- Next action

### Use Video Agent for high-volume outreach

If you're sending the same video shape 100+ times with personalization, Video Agent can earn its add-on cost. If you're sending 10/month, it probably doesn't.

### AI Avatars for evergreen reuse

Use avatars for explainer content that doesn't need re-recording when staff turns over. Don't use avatars for personalized human outreach where the human relationship is the point.

### Role-specific variants

Admin, manager, and end user need different depth levels. Maintain separate versions where necessary.

### Review cycles with owners

Assign ownership. Refresh SLAs ("review every quarter", "update within 7 days of major UI change"). Prevents library decay.

## Pricing

The 2026 pricing structure:

- **Free**: $0. 5 videos/mo, 15 AI videos, 3 custom AI avatars, basic analytics
- **Starter**: public paid plan. Unlimited recording, full analytics, team performance analytics, branded sharing, password protection, folder management
- **Teams**: custom pricing for teams of 5+. CRM/MAP integrations (Salesforce, HubSpot, Outreach), advanced analytics, customizable CTAs
- **Enterprise**: custom. SSO user management, secure playback, unlimited integrations, and custom security options
- **Video Agent (add-on)**: add-on on Starter and Teams; custom pricing on public pages. Includes unlimited AI videos, custom avatars, automated CRM-triggered delivery

The math to model: seat count, Teams quote, Video Agent entitlement, and whether Enterprise security is required. Vidyard is quote-driven once you need CRM workflows.

For revenue teams with clear pipeline attribution, the price works. For teams without that connection, it's expensive Loom.

## Vidyard vs the alternatives

Pick Vidyard when:

- You need business workflow integrations (CRM and automation)
- Engagement intelligence matters, not just file export
- You want customer-facing async communication at scale
- The Video Agent automation fits your outbound motion
- You need governance controls as video usage expands

Pick something else when:

- You want the fastest informal internal comms (Loom)
- You need a heavy timeline editor (Camtasia)
- Static docs are the deliverable, not video (Scribe)
- The per-seat math doesn't work for your team size
- You want AI translation or dubbing (Descript, Clueso)

If your training program is tightly connected to customer lifecycle metrics, Vidyard's operational model fits. If your primary need is polished post production, it's not the single tool.

## Integrations

Vidyard's integration story is the entire reason to choose it over Loom.

### CRM and sales engagement (Teams+)

- Salesforce (native, view data in lead/contact context)
- HubSpot (native, video view data in CRM workflows)
- Outreach (native)
- Salesloft (native)

### Marketing automation

- Marketo, Eloqua, Pardot referenced
- Lead scoring based on watch behavior
- Engagement triggers for nurture workflows

### Productivity

- Gmail and Google Workspace (record and share from inbox)
- Outlook (record and share)
- Slack (instant share)
- Microsoft Teams (record and share)

### Dev and other

- API access on Enterprise
- Webhooks for custom triggers
- Zapier for everything else

## Use cases we've seen work

### Personalized sales outreach

SDRs record a 60-second video referencing a prospect's website or LinkedIn. Open rates beat plain text by 2-3x in most teams' data. Video Agent automates this at volume.

### Tiered onboarding by segment

Role-based onboarding tracks (Admin, Power User, End User). Route the right sequence by account type via CRM integration.

### Support deflection

Convert top ticket categories into reusable video answers. Link in macros. Track engagement.

### Release enablement

Per release, short "what changed, why it matters" videos for CS, support, sales. Tag to feature areas.

### CS adoption nudges

Engagement signals trigger follow up when watch completion is low or high-value features are underused. Renewal motion benefits.

### Marketing nurtures

AI-generated personalized variant videos in drip campaigns. Higher response than text-only emails.

## ROI

Evaluate on workflow outcomes, not view counts.

- Input metrics: content production time, repeat explanations, training update velocity
- Process metrics: watch completion, response speed, follow-up cycle
- Business metrics: onboarding time to value, support ticket reduction, conversion influence, renewal lift

Vidyard case studies report meaningful commercial impact (pipeline, cycle time, retention). Treat those numbers as directional and validate against your own baseline.

What can hurt you:

- Per-seat pricing that grows faster than usage justifies
- Video Agent add-on that doesn't pay back if your outreach volume is low
- Adoption without CRM tie-in (you're paying for the integration value you're not using)

## Is it right for you?

Vidyard fits when your team needs:

- Fast screen and video comms
- Centralized hosting and distribution
- Engagement-aware follow up
- Integration with CRM and marketing automation
- Security and governance as adoption scales
- Automated personalized outreach at volume (Video Agent)

Less compelling as a one-stop choice if your dominant need is cinematic editing.

Wrong fit if you:

- Don't have a CRM tie-in for the video use case
- Are budget-sensitive at the per-seat level
- Want async team-to-team messaging at low cost (Loom)

For most software orgs focused on revenue, onboarding, and customer comms, Vidyard is an operational video layer, not just a recorder.

## The honest take

Vidyard in 2026 is one of the most AI-forward business video tools in the category. Video Agent and AI Avatars are real product investments, not feature checkboxes. The tradeoff is quote-based pricing once you need Teams, CRM/MAP integrations, or the Video Agent add-on.

For revenue teams that can attribute pipeline to video usage, the math works. For teams that want video as a low-cost async communication tool, Loom is cheaper and gets you 80% of the value. The right call depends on whether engagement data + CRM automation is part of your motion or not.

## Sources reviewed

- https://www.vidyard.com/ (verified June 2026)
- https://www.vidyard.com/pricing/
- https://www.vidyard.com/security/
- https://www.vidyard.com/screen-recording/
- https://www.vidyard.com/integrations/
- https://www.vidyard.com/case-studies/zycus-procurement-software-enterprise-video-case-study/
- https://www.vidyard.com/case-studies/mediavalet-cutting-sales-cycle/
- https://demosmith.ai/blog/vidyard-review-2026
- https://supademo.com/blog/vidyard-pricing
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/vidyard.com
- https://www.trustradius.com/products/vidyard/reviews

## Use with Knolbase

Produce role-specific product walkthroughs, onboarding clips, and support explainers in Vidyard. Ingest that content into Knolbase. We map each video to user personas, product modules, and lifecycle stages, then layer personalized learning paths and contextual delivery on top of your Vidyard library.


Business video platform that connects screen recordings to your CRM, sales, and support workflows

Vidyard is the screen recorder that grew up and got an enterprise sales motion. Record, host, share, track engagement, push view data into HubSpot or Salesforce, and trigger follow ups based on who watched. The 2026 push added Video Agent (automated personalized video creation from buyer signals) and AI Avatars (talking-head videos without recording).

Vidyard

Vidyard is a screen recorder and business video platform that ties recording to engagement analytics and CRM workflows, with native HubSpot and Salesforce integration on Teams, plus 2026 Video Agent for auto-generated personalized outreach and AI Avatars for talking-head videos. Current public pricing lists Free and Starter, with Teams and Enterprise on custom quotes; CRM/MAP integrations start on Teams. Windows and macOS.

Loom vs Vidyard

Loom

Vidyard

Feature Comparison

Loom AI Features

Vidyard AI Features

Loom - Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Vidyard - Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Tools Compatible On

Find tools with

By Pricing

Product

Use cases

Solutions

Legal and Security

Tools and Social

Guides

Feature	Loom	Vidyard
Free Available
Windows Support
macOS Support
Linux Support
Zoom Effects
Auto Captions
Team Collaboration
Audio Recording
Enterprise Security
Script Generation
AI Voiceovers
Auto Article Generation