AI-powered screen recording tools with automated features and smart capabilities

AI Features

Tools with AI-generated voiceover capabilities

AI Voiceovers

Tools with advanced audio recording and editing capabilities

Audio Recording

Tools that can automatically generate articles from recordings

Auto Article Generation

Screen recording tools with automatic caption generation for accessibility

Auto Caption

Enterprise-grade screen recording tools with security features

Enterprise Security

Completely free screen recording tools with no cost or limitations

Free

Screen recording tools with both free and paid tiers

Freemium

Premium screen recording tools with advanced features and professional support

Paid

Tools that can automatically generate scripts and content

Script Generation

Screen recording tools with built-in team collaboration features

Team Collaboration

Zoom Effects

Screen recording tools that work on Linux

Linux

Screen recording tools that work on macOS

macOS

Screen recording tools that work on Windows

Windows


## What you get

Loom is the shortest path from "I need to explain this" to "here's a video, watch it when you can." Atlassian acquired it in 2023 for $975M, and as of 2026 the product sits inside the Atlassian Administration console for billing and Guard for SSO/SCIM. The recording experience hasn't changed.

- One click recording from desktop app or Chrome extension
- A share link the second the recording ends, no upload spinner
- Cloud hosting with privacy controls and password protection on paid tiers
- Auto captions and transcripts in 50+ languages
- Recording quality up to 4K on Business and above
- Native Jira and Confluence recording entry points (post-Atlassian)
- A surprisingly deep set of integrations beyond Atlassian (Slack, Notion, Linear, GitHub)

## Who it's for

Loom is the default for async team communication.

1. Engineers explaining bugs without scheduling a call
2. PMs sharing scope clarifications across timezones
3. Sales sending personalized follow ups
4. Customer success walking a customer through a problem instead of typing 6 paragraphs
5. Support reps converting "how do I" tickets into short reusable answers

It is not designed for training modules. If you want a polished onboarding video with chapters, callouts, and quiz checkpoints, use Camtasia or ScreenPal.

## The AI features

The AI tier is where Loom earns its 2026 price. Skip it if all you need is the recorder.

### Auto titles, summaries, and chapters

The AI watches the recording and generates a title, a short summary, and chapter markers. The summaries are clean enough to drop into a Jira ticket or Slack post without editing. Chapters save real time on anything past 4 minutes.

### Filler word and silence removal

One click cuts "um" and dead air. The output sounds tighter, not robotic. Useful for sales videos where pacing matters.

### Edit by transcript

Delete a sentence in the text, the video cuts. Same model Descript pioneered. Loom's version is simpler and faster, but doesn't go as deep.

### Auto meeting recaps and notes

Newer in 2026. Loom records the meeting, generates a recap with timestamps, and lifts action items. Designed to compete with Otter.ai and the new Atlassian Rovo agents.

### Variables and auto CTAs

For sales workflows: dynamic variables (first name, company, custom fields) and auto-inserted CTAs at video end. Less useful for internal comms, very useful for outbound.

If you're not paying for AI, Loom is still the fastest recorder out there. You'll just do the title and summary yourself.

## Collaboration

This is where Loom earns its price.

- Share by link, paste anywhere
- Workspace libraries for shared team videos
- Granular access (team, individual, domain)
- Comments and reactions on the video itself
- Variable playback speed and picture in picture for the viewer
- Engagement analytics that show who watched, how far they got, and what they reacted to

For onboarding videos this is the difference between "we sent a video" and "we know who actually watched it."

## Security

Loom's security page redirects to Atlassian's security measures. Treat these as Atlassian-wide controls and compliance references, then confirm Loom-specific scope in the Atlassian Trust Center during procurement.

- SOC 2 and ISO 27001 referenced as part of Atlassian's ongoing compliance verification
- NIST 800-53 controls referenced in Atlassian's security measures
- Atlassian publishes FedRAMP-compliant solutions; confirm whether Loom is in scope for your required environment
- AES-256 encryption at rest, full disk
- TLS 1.2+ with Perfect Forward Secrecy in transit
- Zero Trust framework across Atlassian infrastructure
- GDPR via Atlassian's global privacy compliance program
- MFA on sensitive system access
- SSO and SCIM via Atlassian Guard (Enterprise tier)
- Centralized audit logging with read-only access

If your videos include staging environments or live customer UI, get the SOC 2 report, DPA, and product-specific compliance scope before broad rollout. The Atlassian controls are real but the procurement process is on you.

## What users actually say

Public sentiment in 2026 splits cleanly into "the product still works great" and "the Atlassian transition made admin and billing harder." Both are valid.

Common 2025-2026 complaints (synthesized from Trustpilot and competitor analyses):

> "I used to sign in with my Google account and it worked perfectly. Now I can't log in anymore."
> Trustpilot reviewer, post-Atlassian migration

> Some competitor analyses still frame the Atlassian migration as a major billing risk. Treat those examples as cautionary, not current plan documentation: Loom's current pricing FAQ still references Creator Lite members on Starter and Business.

Common praise:

> "I can explain any topic or demo, no meeting needed, within minutes. Loom's AI features are great."
> Rushan M., Freelance web designer

> "For team collaboration, Loom became a daily tool. Record, explain, share, no more long meetings."
> Manan B., AI Developer

### What people like

- Easiest tool in the category, full stop
- Plays nice with the rest of the SaaS stack
- Replaces meetings with 3-minute videos
- The free tier is enough to evaluate seriously
- AI summaries and chapters on Business + AI save real time
- New auto meeting recaps and notes (2026) extend the use case beyond async sends

### What people don't like

- The 5-minute cap on the free plan
- Editing is intentionally minimal, no timeline or motion graphics
- Workspace billing and role management can be confusing after the Atlassian migration
- Admins need to separate Creators from Creator Lite members before modeling cost
- Login and authentication issues reported through the 2025 Atlassian migration
- Legacy Enterprise migration to the new Atlassian Loom workspaces was still incomplete as of mid-2026

## How we'd use it

### Keep it short

If your Loom is longer than 5 minutes, you probably wrote a doc instead. Trim or split.

### Don't over script

Bullets, not a script. Loom shines when it sounds conversational. If you sound like you're reading, just record it again.

### Show real environments

Record on production or staging. Webcam overlay if it's a person-to-person message. Skip the webcam for tutorial style.

### Use chapters on longer recordings

If you go past 5 minutes, add chapters. Viewers come back for one section.

### Post in the workspace, not just DMs

Don't just direct-message. Post in the team workspace and link from the relevant doc. Future you will thank present you.

### Archive old videos

The library gets stale fast. Archive outdated content or future viewers will follow the wrong walkthrough.

### Use the AI tier intentionally

Business + AI is $20/user/month annual. It's only worth it if your team is making 10+ recordings per week, or if you use the new auto meeting recaps as a Notion replacement.

## Pricing

- **Starter** (Free): 25 videos, 5 minutes each, 720p, transcriptions in 50+ languages, 50 member cap
- **Business**: $18/user/month monthly, $15/user/month annual. Unlimited videos, up to 4K, password protection, analytics, exportable engagement
- **Business + AI**: $24/user/month monthly, $20/user/month annual. All Business features plus the full AI suite (summaries, chapters, filler removal, edit by transcript, auto meeting recaps)
- **Enterprise**: custom. Adds SSO via Atlassian Guard, SCIM, Salesforce integration, 99.95% uptime SLA, EBA compliance, custom data retention, dedicated account manager

Three things to know before buying in 2026:

1. Annual is ~17% cheaper than monthly; confirm Creator and Creator Lite role counts in the admin flow before buying
2. Atlassian.com vs. Loom.com purchasing: only Atlassian.com purchases get the Atlassian Administration hub, Jira/Confluence recording entry points, and Atlassian Guard SSO/SCIM
3. Creator Lite still appears in Loom's current pricing FAQ, so model Creator and Creator Lite roles directly in the admin flow before rollout

Most teams start free, hit the 5-minute cap or the analytics ceiling, then jump to Business. The AI tier earns its price if you're making 10+ recordings a week.

## Loom vs the alternatives

Pick Loom when:

- Speed and simplicity matter more than polish
- You already pay for Atlassian (Jira, Confluence, Bitbucket) and want one bill
- You need cross platform support including Linux
- Non-technical contributors are part of your team

Pick something else when:

- You need a real timeline editor (Camtasia)
- You're automating doc generation from screen recordings (Clueso)
- You're on macOS and want a polished marketing demo (Screen Studio)
- You want step by step generated guides (Guidde)
- You record in clips and want to reorder before publishing (Tella)
- You need engagement data tied to CRM (Vidyard)

## Integrations

Loom plays well with everything you already use, and now plays especially well with Atlassian.

### Atlassian native

- Jira (record from a ticket, embed in issue)
- Confluence (record from a page, embed in doc)
- Atlassian Guard for SSO and SCIM
- Atlassian Administration for billing and admin

### Dev tools

- GitHub and GitLab (embed in PR comments)
- Linear (link recordings to issues)
- Slack and Discord (instant video updates)
- Notion (embed in pages)

### Productivity and CRM

- Google Workspace (Gmail, Drive, Calendar)
- Microsoft 365 (Teams, Outlook, SharePoint)
- Salesforce (Enterprise tier only)
- Zoom and Meet (record and share follow ups)

## Use cases we've seen work

### Bug repro for engineering

Record the issue path with webcam off. Drop the link in Jira. Engineering gets reproducible, timestamped context. With the AI tier, auto chapters mark where the bug appears.

### Async PM updates

A 3-minute Loom on Monday replaces the weekly status meeting. Auto summaries land in the team Notion page. People watch on their schedule.

### Sales follow ups

Personalized recap of a customer call with variables and an auto CTA. Open rates beat email-only by 2-3x in most teams' tests.

### Customer success check-ins

CSMs send a Loom on a renewal cycle instead of scheduling a 30-minute call. Engagement analytics tell them whether the customer watched.

### Support deflection

Top 10 "how do I" tickets get a 90-second Loom answer with a permanent link. Support team stops typing the same response.

### Meeting recaps (new in 2026)

Loom records the meeting, generates a recap with timestamps and action items. Replaces Otter/Fireflies for teams already on Atlassian.

## ROI

Returns come from replaced meetings, faster comprehension, and reduced support load.

What pays off:

- Hours saved by replacing 30-minute calls with 3-minute recordings
- Faster ramp for distributed teams across timezones
- Lower support volume on documented workflows
- Better engagement data on internal comms
- One bill if you're already on Atlassian

KPIs to track:

- Meeting hours replaced per week
- Watch completion rate on internal videos
- Support ticket deflection on documented workflows
- Average time from "explain this" to "explained" (before vs after)

What can hurt you:

- Mis-modeling Creator vs Creator Lite roles
- Overpaying for Business + AI seats nobody uses
- Atlassian/Loom admin differences if purchasing through different paths

## Is it right for you?

In 2026, Loom fits if you:

- Already pay for Atlassian and want consolidated billing
- Need async comms across distributed teams
- Don't need cinematic editing
- Have non-technical contributors who need a one-click tool

Wrong fit if you:

- Don't use Atlassian and the new pricing feels punitive
- Need a real editor (Camtasia, Descript)
- Want auto generated docs alongside the video (Clueso, Guidde)
- Need engagement data tied to a CRM (Vidyard)
- Need a very predictable role/billing model before procurement

## The honest take

Loom is still the best async video tool for software teams in 2026. The post-Atlassian transition created real admin and billing friction for some customers, especially teams with mixed creator and viewer populations. But the core recording experience is unchanged: hit record, get a link, share. If you're on Atlassian already, the integration story is now a real reason to standardize. If you're not, the price jump and role model are worth modeling carefully before signup.

Don't pay for the AI tier unless your team will actually use the summaries, chapters, and edit-by-transcript every week. The Business tier is still the right starting point for most teams.

## Sources reviewed

- https://www.loom.com/pricing (verified June 2026)
- https://www.loom.com/security (redirects to Atlassian security measures)
- https://www.atlassian.com/legal/security-measures
- https://supademo.com/blog/loom-pricing (2026 competitor analysis)
- https://www.g2.com/products/atlassian-loom/pricing
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/loom.com (partially blocked in our research run)
- https://www.g2.com/products/atlassian-loom/reviews (blocked in our research run, sentiment synthesized from Supademo analysis)

## Use with Knolbase

Record async walkthroughs and explainers in Loom. Upload them into Knolbase and we'll route them into the right learning paths based on user role and product stage. You record, we personalize.


The async video tool that replaced 'can we hop on a quick call' for an entire generation of SaaS teams

Loom is the reason your last 'this could've been a meeting' meeting didn't happen. Hit record, talk over your screen for 3 minutes, copy the share link, paste in Slack. That's the whole loop. Now part of Atlassian, with native Jira and Confluence recording entry points and shared SSO/SCIM through Atlassian Guard.

Loom

Loom is a screen and webcam recorder with one-click link sharing, now part of Atlassian with native Jira and Confluence integration; AI tier adds summaries, chapters, filler word removal, edit by transcript, and auto meeting recaps. Free plan caps videos at 5 minutes, Business at $18/user/month, Business + AI at $24/user/month; runs on Windows, macOS, Linux, and Chrome.


## What you get

ScreenPal is less a recorder and more a small training stack in one app. You hit record, you trim the result, you upload it (to ScreenPal's own hosting), you share a link, and if you want, you bolt a quiz onto the end and watch a heatmap of where viewers tuned out. Current Max and Team Business plans add ScreenPal AI on top of that workflow.

- Screen plus webcam recording (full screen, area, webcam only, picture in picture)
- Annotations while you're recording (pens, highlights, the usual)
- Timeline editor with trim, overlay, caption support, audio cleanup, storyboards
- Hosting with privacy controls (password, embed, LMS drop-in)
- Learning layer on top: quizzes, polls, ratings, CTAs inside the video
- Analytics: engagement heatmaps and viewer drop off
- ScreenPal AI suite: captions, summaries, text-to-speech, quiz generation, video generation, background removal, and auto-translated titles/summaries/transcripts
- Premium stock on Max: 92k music tracks, 2.8M images/videos
- 4K playback on Max
- Custom domains on Max
- Team management, SAML SSO, LMS integration on Team Business
- Cross-platform: Windows, macOS, iOS, Android, Chromebook

The thing that makes ScreenPal interesting for a training team isn't any single feature. It's that updating a video doesn't break the link. That sounds small. It isn't.

## Who it's for

ScreenPal makes the most sense if your team is running more than one of these motions in parallel:

1. Customer onboarding
2. Internal enablement for support, sales, ops
3. Release education
4. Self-serve support deflection
5. Education and academic training (98 of top 100 US universities use it)

If you're shipping training content continuously and you also want some evidence that the training is working, this is the kind of tool you reach for.

Where it works:

- Mid sized product team that needs onboarding videos every couple of weeks
- Customer success or support teams that want a video answer instead of writing the same Loom-style reply over and over
- Enablement folks who need short explainers, longer walkthroughs, and an occasional quiz checkpoint, all from the same place
- Education and academic teams (compliance-friendly, see security)

Where it doesn't:

- If you want cinema-grade editing, get a real editor. ScreenPal's editor is fine, not Final Cut.
- If you only need "record once, send once," ScreenPal is overkill. Use the OS recorder or a free Chrome extension.

## The AI features

ScreenPal sprinkles AI across creation, hosting, and assessment. The current plans page emphasizes auto-generated captions, titles, summaries, quiz questions, text-to-speech, AI video generation, and auto-translated titles, summaries, and transcripts.

### Captions, titles, summaries

Standard productivity wins on the higher plans. Captions are good enough to publish with a quick proofread. Titles and summaries give you a draft to push into your library. If you do recurring updates, this saves real time in post.

### Text to speech and audio cleanup

Useful if you don't want to be the person on every recording. You can standardize narration style and re-record audio without scheduling a human. Useful for releases when you can update narration on a 5pm Friday without dragging a teammate in.

### Quiz generation

ScreenPal will draft quiz prompts from the video. The drafts are not amazing on day one, but if you're already using their interactive learning flows, this saves you the cold start. Best for converting release demos into a comprehension check.

### AI video generation and background tools

ScreenPal exposes generative and enhancement tools (AI video generation and background handling). For training teams, these work as accelerators, not replacements for subject-matter review.

### Auto-translation

ScreenPal lists auto-translated titles, summaries, and transcripts on Max and Team Business. Useful for discovery and multilingual review, but do not treat it as full AI dubbing or translated voiceover.

AI is a force multiplier. It is not a subject matter expert. You still need a human pass before you ship a video that touches billing, permissions, or anything compliance-flavored.

## Collaboration

ScreenPal's team value is strongest when content changes frequently. The platform leans into shared hosting and update-friendly publishing.

- Shared content organization with folders and channels
- Team management on team-tier plans
- Transfer ownership and administrative controls
- Link and embed sharing for docs, LMS, and internal portals
- Video replacement with stable URLs so published links don't break during updates

For software training, stable URLs are underrated. Product UIs change constantly. Replacing a video without changing links avoids retraining internal teams and avoids broken embeds in help centers.

## Security

Public product messaging highlights security and privacy controls for hosted training assets:

- Password and privacy controls
- SSO and SAML on business plans
- Role and admin features on team plans
- Compliance messaging for education use cases (COPPA, FERPA, GDPR, iKeepSafe)
- Trusted by Fortune 100 companies and 98 of top 100 US universities

For software teams handling internal product knowledge, this matters because onboarding videos often include sensitive UI context (account data patterns, internal workflows, staging environments).

Enterprise buyers should request formal security documentation, data-handling details, and legal terms directly before rollout. The Fortune 100 and university adoption signal is meaningful for procurement, but it's not a substitute for your own due diligence.

## What users actually say

Public review signals are mixed-positive. Many users emphasize ease and training utility. Negative reviews commonly raise reliability concerns or frustration around feature limits.

> "Screenpal works flawlessly and the subscription price is affordable. The team is constantly adding functionality WITHOUT raising the price."
> Catherine, Trustpilot review (Oct 24, 2024)

> "Step by step you are giving users more and more tools to create learning objects for online study and training (with no need to be a programmer)."
> Rui Manuel Pereira, Trustpilot review (Jan 29, 2025)

> "I installed the software on my iPad Pro, then it started limiting me to 15-minute videos, every other video recording failed to save."
> Patricia Linty, Trustpilot review (Feb 15, 2025)

The takeaway for software teams: user sentiment supports ScreenPal's practicality. Validate reliability in your own environment before standardizing across departments.

### What people like

- Cheap and easy to start
- Recorder, editor, and host in one place
- Works well for instructional content
- Good value perception from many paid users
- AI captions are a real productivity bump
- Fortune 100 and university adoption signal is real

### What people don't like

- Reliability hiccups, especially on mobile
- Feature gating across plans can feel arbitrary
- The product has a lot of surface area if you just want a recorder
- Mobile experience varies by device

## How we'd use it

### Split release content from durable training

Use short videos for release notes. Use longer structured modules for onboarding. Don't mix them. They have different update cadences.

### Standardize a recording template

Problem, demo, common mistakes, expected outcome. Same shape every time. Learners build muscle memory. Your team stops debating structure on every recording.

### Pair business critical videos with a quiz

If the video covers billing, permissions, or anything where someone could break production, add a quiz. One or two questions. Pass before progress.

### Use chapters and summaries

People come back to training videos for one specific step. Chapters and a 3-line summary at the top mean they don't have to scrub through 8 minutes of context.

### Watch the analytics for rewinds

If everyone rewinds the same 20-second clip, that section is broken. Tighten the narration, slow the demo, zoom in.

### Use video translation for global training (2026)

If you're shipping in multiple regions, the auto-translation feature on Max can reduce transcript and metadata work, but full localized voiceover still needs a separate workflow.

### Assign owners per module

On every release, the owner decides: keep, patch, or retire. Stable URLs mean a patch doesn't break anything downstream.

## Pricing

The 2026 pricing structure (annual billing):

- **Free**: $0/month forever. 15-minute recording cap, 10 hosted videos, basic editing, 5 quiz videos. No AI.
- **Deluxe**: $4/month annual. Unlimited recording, unlimited hosting, full editor, storyboards, AI speech-to-text captions, 350 standard stock tracks
- **Max**: $10/month annual. All Deluxe plus full ScreenPal AI suite (auto captions, TTS narration, AI video generator, AI quiz generation, auto-translated titles/summaries/transcripts, background removal), 92k music tracks, 2.8M images/videos, unlimited quizzes/polls, 4K playback, custom domains, advanced analytics
- **Team Business**: $8/user/month annual (20% discount, 3+ user minimum). All Max plus team collab tools, management dashboard, advanced integrations, SAML SSO, role-based permissions, LMS integration, phone and onboarding support

Monthly options are available but cost more. The annual discount is meaningful.

How to map these:

- Solo creator running internal demos: Free or Deluxe is plenty
- Training program with a real cadence: Max, mostly for the AI tooling and stock
- Cross functional rollout where you need governance: Team Business

## ScreenPal vs the alternatives

ScreenPal sits in a busy category. It competes with async messaging tools (Loom), desktop editors (Camtasia), and open source recorders (OBS).

### Where ScreenPal wins

- Balanced stack across record, edit, host, and quiz
- A faster publish loop than stitching together four products
- Built for recurring training, not just one off recordings
- Education and academic compliance posture (COPPA, FERPA, iKeepSafe)

### Where alternatives win

- Loom for quick async messages with cleaner share UX
- Camtasia for real timeline editing with effects (especially the 2026 release with Audiate and ElevenLabs voices)
- OBS Studio if your budget is zero and your patience is high
- Clueso if you need video + step-by-step doc in one pass
- Vidyard if you need engagement data tied to CRM workflows
- Guidde if you need AI generated step narration with SCORM export

### How we'd pick

Pick ScreenPal when training is an ongoing operating function (owners, cadence, metrics) and you want it under one login. Don't pick it for one-shot recordings. You'll feel the surface area.

## Integrations

The ecosystem leans practical: distribution and training-stack compatibility.

- Video meeting integrations: Zoom, Microsoft Teams, Webex
- LMS support including LTI on plan materials (Team Business)
- Embed and link workflows into Notion, Confluence, help centers
- Browser extension for quick capture

For software teams this means you don't need a custom integration to slot ScreenPal into your enablement stack. It's already shaped for it.

## Use cases we've seen work

### Onboarding tracks by role

Admin and end user see different videos. Each track has its own quiz checkpoint. Watch completion before QBRs.

### Support deflection

Top 10 "how do I" tickets get a 90-second video answer with a permanent link. Support team stops typing the same response.

### Release education

Per release, a 3-7 minute "what changed and why it matters" video. Add one quiz question to surface people who didn't get it.

### SOP training

Document escalation paths, handoff rules, report creation as consistent walkthroughs. Test understanding annually.

### Partner enablement

Gated channels for implementation partners. Track engagement before they certify or launch.

### Academic course content

The 98-of-top-100 US universities adoption signal is real. The compliance posture (COPPA, FERPA, iKeepSafe) and stable URL replacement make this a default for academic instructional design.

### Global training (2026)

Auto-translated titles, summaries, and transcripts on Max help a single English-language master become more usable across regions, but they do not replace full localization or dubbing.

## ROI

The math on ScreenPal doesn't come from "we recorded a video." It comes from operational efficiency and better learning outcomes.

What drives the return:

- Production efficiency: less context switching across record, edit, host
- Faster updates: stable URLs mean update without breaking links
- Better learning evidence: quizzes and analytics show where training works
- Support savings: video answers replace repeat explanations
- Global expansion: auto-translated titles, summaries, and transcripts reduce multilingual metadata and transcript work

KPIs to model:

- Hours saved per training asset
- Ticket reduction in top categories
- Onboarding time to milestone
- Viewer completion and quiz performance
- Language coverage for global teams

Teams with frequent product updates see the biggest returns. Most training cost lives in updates, not initial production.

## Is it right for you?

In 2026, ScreenPal looks like a good fit for software teams that treat training as a delivery system, not a side project.

Pick it if:

- You publish training continuously
- You need admin controls plus collaboration
- You care about engagement data, not just views
- You want fewer tools, not more
- You ship in multiple languages (2026 AI translation)

Skip it if:

- Your use case is occasional, lightweight recording
- You need filmmaking-level editing
- You prefer a best-of-breed stack and don't mind the integration tax

## The honest take

ScreenPal isn't just a recorder. It's a training delivery workflow. The bet you're making is whether your team will use the host, the analytics, and the quiz features, or whether you'll just record and share. If it's the latter, you're paying for surface area you won't touch.

The auto-translation feature meaningfully extends the use case for global teams, as long as you do not mistake it for full dubbing. The Fortune 100 and university adoption signal is real procurement evidence.

Run a pilot. Test on your real devices, not just the demo environment. Run one actual onboarding flow end to end. Measure outcomes before you roll it across the company.

## Sources reviewed

- https://screenpal.com/screen-recorder (verified June 2026)
- https://screenpal.com/features
- https://screenpal.com/video-management
- https://screenpal.com/quizzing
- https://screenpal.com/video-analytics
- https://screenpal.com/plans (verified June 2026)
- https://www.trustpilot.com/review/screenpal.com
- https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/671a76acd8f5ca82142f4846
- https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/679a9d6ecf3fc1ff21a1b7c2
- https://www.trustpilot.com/reviews/6881e236521a17f0b4fb59f4
- https://www.learningrevolution.net/screenpal-review/
- https://aiproductivity.ai/tools/screenpal/

## Use with Knolbase

Record role-specific onboarding videos and release walkthroughs in ScreenPal, then upload them into Knolbase. We map them into persona-aware learning paths, surface the weak comprehension zones from engagement data, and keep training current as your product changes.


Screen recorder plus editor plus hosting plus quizzing, in one tab

ScreenPal (the artist formerly known as Screencast-O-Matic) records the screen, edits the recording, hosts the video, and bolts on a quiz at the end. Used by Fortune 100 companies and 98 of the top 100 US universities. Current Max and Team Business plans include ScreenPal AI features such as captions, TTS, AI video generation, quiz generation, and auto-translated titles, summaries, and transcripts.

ScreenPal

ScreenPal (formerly Screencast-O-Matic) is a screen recorder, editor, and video host with quizzes, viewer analytics, and an AI suite (captions, TTS, AI video generation, quiz generation, and auto-translated titles/summaries/transcripts) on Max. Free plan caps recordings at 15 minutes and includes 10 hosted videos; paid plans run $4 to $10/month, Team Business at $8/user/month with SAML SSO.

Loom vs ScreenPal

Loom

ScreenPal

Feature Comparison

Loom AI Features

ScreenPal AI Features

Loom - Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

ScreenPal - Pros & Cons

Pros

Cons

Tools Compatible On

Find tools with

By Pricing

Product

Use cases

Solutions

Legal and Security

Tools and Social

Guides

Feature	Loom	ScreenPal
Free Available
Windows Support
macOS Support
Linux Support
Zoom Effects
Auto Captions
Team Collaboration
Audio Recording
Enterprise Security
Script Generation
AI Voiceovers
Auto Article Generation